The Harmony of Thought: Purnima Sinha’s Scientific Life
In the world of higher education, knowledge is often separated into two approaches: the deep and the broad. The former focuses on a single discipline—often associated with the sciences—while the latter encourages connections across fields, a style more familiar to the arts and humanities. Science, in this model, becomes a specialized, linear pursuit, while the liberal arts embrace breadth and interdisciplinarity. Dr. Purnima Sinha’s life and work defied these binaries.
 |
| Purnima Sinha with |
Emerging in the early decades of postcolonial India, she worked in X-ray crystallography—a field of modern physics that analyze the structure of various materials—and became the first woman from Calcutta University to earn a PhD in Physics. However, her understanding of science transcended its disciplinary shell. She was not only a researcher but also a writer, translator, and musician, equally drawn to cultural life and scientific inquiry. In a time when Indian science was still negotiating its identity between colonial legacy and nationalist aspiration, Sinha saw science not as an isolated pursuit of truth, but as a deeply social enterprise [1]. Her life, both in and beyond the lab, offers a glimpse into a generation of Indian scientists who were building not just institutions, but ideas—about knowledge, language, and nationhood.
Purnima Sinha, born into a progressive Bengali family on 12 October 1927, grew up in an environment that encouraged education and independent thinking. Her father, Naresh Chandra Sengupta, a constitutional lawyer, strongly supported women's education. While her sisters pursued mathematics, economics, and chemistry, Purnima chose the road less traveled—physics. At a time when other fields such as botany and biochemistry were beginning to open up to women, physics remained a largely male enclave.
Her interest caught the attention of Professor Satyendra Nath Bose, the pioneering physicist known for his work in quantum mechanics, who had just joined Calcutta University as the Khaira Professor of Physics. Bose recognized her potential and brought her into his research group at the Khaira Laboratory, where she joined a team working on X-ray diffraction studies of crystal structures. Sinha, like her colleagues, scoured Calcutta’s streets for World War II surplus, repurposing scrap into the X-ray equipment her research demanded. In 'Lilavati’s Daughters' (publication by Indian Academy of Sciences, on women scientists of India) [2], she recalled: “At that time, about ten of us were involved in experimental research at the Khaira Laboratory. Each of us used to fabricate her or his own instruments according to individual needs. Our efforts in the X-ray laboratory finally led to a complete classification of about fifty clay sample categories.”
Sinha's work aimed to fill this gap by classifying these clays using modern analytical tools. This scientific effort was not just about materials—it was also about uncovering the diverse environmental conditions that shaped them, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of India’s natural resources [3]. At the time, she published two articles in the prestigious Nature journals—an exceptional feat for an Indian woman of her era.
Her scientific curiosity soon extended beyond crystallography, which took her to Stanford University [4]. There, she redefined her field of research, and ventured into biophysics, participating in the larger scientific project to understand how life could have emerged from non-living matter—a central question in abiogenesis. This interdisciplinary field brought together physics, chemistry, biology, and geology. By the 1960s, researchers were exploring self-organizing systems—such as clays, mineral surfaces, and crystal structures—as possible scaffolds. These may have served as templates for more complex biological molecules like RNA or DNA.
Sinha explored the structural parallels between clay minerals and DNA—two forms of order from seemingly chaotic beginnings. Clays could adsorb organic molecules, align them in orderly patterns, and potentially facilitate polymerization—helping small molecules become longer chains, a key step toward life. This hypothesis gained momentum from the idea that inorganic minerals might have served as the first 'information storage' systems—before biological evolution took over. This interdisciplinary curiosity reflected not just scientific rigor but a deeper philosophical fascination with life and form.
After her stint at Stanford, she returned to India, where she continued to pursue her evolving scientific interests. She spent the next two decades in prominent research institutions, including the Geological Survey of India and the J.C. Bose Institute. Eventually, her path led her to the Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute, where she began exploring the physics of ceramic color. It was during this phase that her scientific and artistic sensibilities came together—she didn’t just study clay and ceramics but also learned clay modeling, engaging with the material hands-on and expressively.
In one article responding to the oriental ideas of spiritualizing and exoticizing Indian higher education [5], she wrote: "In India today there are very few professional scientists who have studied, or even know what there is in Vedanta. Very few scientists of exceptional caliber study Vedanta seriously -because of their extra mental energy- either to support or to contradict the Vedantist point of view. But the non-technical problems that most of the scientists in a scientific institute in India actually discuss among themselves are not the futility of this world, but the inconveniences that disturb them in day-to-day, worldly life—like the difficulty in getting a place to live in within a reasonable rent, of getting children admitted to school, of getting unadulterated food, and things of this kind." Her tone—both candid and critical—offers a rare glimpse into the lived realities of institutional science. One could wonder whether a male contemporary might have voiced such quotidian frustrations in a formal piece. This observation dismantles the notion that scientists live in an abstract world, untouched by real-world concerns.
Her work unfolded at a time when independent India was redefining its scientific identity. The country was grappling with the dual challenge of embracing science as a universal intellectual endeavor while simultaneously asserting its relevance as tool for the development of the nation. This vision demanded that science not only generate knowledge but also drive socioeconomic change. This ideological framework shaped both the opportunities and burdens of scientific labor in Purnima Sinha’s era.
True to her belief in the unity of knowledge, Sinha’s intellectual world extended well beyond science. Outside the lab, Sinha’s creative pursuits were equally remarkable. She was among the first women students of tabla maestro Pandit Jnan Prakash Ghosh and studied Hindustani classical music under Yamini Ganguly. She also trained in painting with Gopal Ghosh, one of Bengal’s most respected artists. Combining her academic curiosity with her love for music, she even published articles on music which includes 'Indian Classical Music and Western Listeners' published in 'Journal of the Indian Musicological Society'.
Her literary and academic interests extended even further. Married to the eminent anthropologist Dr. Surajit Sinha—who later became Vice-Chancellor of Visva-Bharati University at Santiniketan—she developed a deep engagement with anthropology. Drawing from their fieldwork in the tribal regions of Purulia and the Andaman Islands, she authored several analytical pieces on indigenous music and oral traditions. In 1970, she published 'An Approach to the Study of Indian Music', and in 2005, she wrote a comparative essay titled 'Jarawa Songs and Vedic Chant: A Comparison of Melodic Pattern' in 'The Journal of the Asiatic Society' [6].
Equally significant was her commitment to scientific communication in the vernacular. Inspired by Bose—who believed in teaching science in regional languages and had founded the 'Bangiya Bijnan Parishad' (Bengal Science Association)—Sinha took up this mission with conviction. She published 'Amar Katha', a verbatim compilation of interviews she had conducted with Bose in 1973, and authored 'Bijnan Sadhanar Dharay Satyendranath Bose' in 1980, preserving and contextualizing his legacy for future generations. She also translated Erwin Schrödinger’s 'Mind and Matter' into Bengali in 1990, bridging the gap between scientific thought and local readership. The Sinhas also established an informal school, 'Mela Meshar Pathshala', in Santiniketan, devoted to the education of tribal children—an extension of their belief in socially engaged scholarship.
Purnima Sinha’s journey exemplifies the idea that knowledge need not be fragmented. She challenged the assumption that one must specialize narrowly to contribute meaningfully. Instead, she built bridges—between science and society, theory and practice, tradition and innovation. In a world that often pushes individuals to choose between depth and breadth, Purnima Sinha showed that one can pursue both—and in doing so, leave behind a legacy that is quite wholesome.
Written by Janaky S. and edited by Parvathy Ramachandran @ThinkHer
References:
1. https://www.indiascienceandtechnology.gov.in/sites/all/themes/vigyan/pdf_file/Purnima_Sinha.pdf
2.https://www.ias.ac.in/public/Resources/Initiatives/Women_in_Science/Contributors/purnima_supurnasinha.pdf
3.SINGH, R., & ROY, S. C. (2019). Purnima Sinha and her Doctoral Work Under Professor SN Bose. SCIENCE AND CULTURE.
4.https://www.getbengal.com/details/dr-purnima-sinha-the-first-female-physicist-from-c-u-who-did-her-phd-way-back-in-the-1950s#google_vignette
5.Sinha, P. (1967). Science and Society in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 758-762.
6. https://www.peepultree.world/livehistoryindia/story/people/dr-purnima-sinha-pioneering-physicist
It is not only a biography but it describes what should be the style of thinking. Without concern the society any study is incomplete. The artical chosen such Indian women personality specialy in the field physics who touch every emissions of life. Thanks Dr Janaky S and Parvathy R for their hard work beyond their professional career to encourage us to live with multiple discipline.
ReplyDeleteHappy to know that the article resonated with you. Thanks a lot for the appreciation.
Delete👌👌👌
ReplyDelete<3
Delete